Raül Romeva i Rueda

REFLEXIONS PERISCÒPIQUES

Més enllà de Fukushima: seguretat nuclear a Europa

El Grup Verds/ALE fa temps que treballem intensament per construir una Europa que, primer, consumeixi menys energia (en malgastem molta) i segon pugui abastir-se energeticament a través de fonts no contaminants i renovables.

Ho fèiem força sols, val a dir, i molt abans que tingués lloc el dramàtic accident de Fukushima.

Sigui com sigui és evident que el context sociomediàtic ha canviat, i que d’una manera o una altra comporta, almenys, que alguns dels postulats defensats pels pro-nuclears trontollin, especialment els que tenen a veure amb la seguretat.

És cert que Europa no és Japó, ni en termes d’activitat sísmica ni pel risc de tsunamis, però de cap manera estem absents de riscos i perills. Per tot això els Verds hem el·laborat una sèrie de recomanacions que esperem contribueixin a que el debat, més enllà d’estar a favor o en contra, derivi cap a una seriosa reflexió sobre la necessitat de canviar de model i de mesurar el riscos de manera molt més responsable.

Nuclear
safety in Europe

Recommendations
following the Japanese nuclear accident

In the aftermath of the massive earthquake and
resulting tsunami, the people in Japan are experiencing a tragic and
devastating disaster that is constantly evolving.

The damage caused by the earthquake and
tsunami to the nuclear power plant in Fukushima (as well as others) has meant that
the Japanese people are now also confronted with the threat of a potential
nuclear catastrophe.

These tragic events cast renewed doubt about
the reassurances of the nuclear industry on the safety of nuclear reactors and
underline that it is impossible to be ‘in control’ of nuclear safety. The construction
of nuclear reactors in seismically active regions has long been criticised as being
irresponsible. The safety of older reactors, which are based on decades old technology and
outdated safety standards, must also now be reassessed. This is clearly
relevant in Europe in the context of the current debates on extending nuclear power
plant life in several member states. Several measures have to be taken in the EU as
a consequence to the disaster in Japan.


1. The EU and its member states have to
abandon their commitment to the high risk technology of nuclear power and start
a phase-out now.


2. In the process of the nuclear phase out,
reactors posing heightened risks must be given priority, including:

— All reactors in seismic regions (e.g. Krsko in Slovenia, Fessenheim in
France, Cofrentes in Spain)

— All reactors without a secondary – or full pressure – containment
(e.g. Mochovce 1+2 in Slovakia, Paks in Hungary,
Bohunice in Slovakia)

— All boiling water reactors with a single cooling system and storage of
spent fuel outside of the containment (e.g.
Brunsbüttel, Krümmel, Isar 1, Philippsburg 1, Gundremmingen in Germany)

— All reactors built before 1980 and ‘generation 1’ reactors, as well as
those that have had serious safety problems in the past
(e.g. Biblis A and B, Neckarwestheim 1, Unterweser in Germany,
Wylfa, Oldury and Sellafield in the UK, Blayais, Bugey, Dampierre, Fessenheim,
St Laurent in France, Doel and Tihange in Belgium, Borssele in the
Netherlands, Forsmark and Ringhals in Sweden)


3. An immediate freeze of all new reactors,
either planned or under construction (e.g. Flamanville in France, Mochovce in Slovakia, Belene in Bulgaria, Okiluoto 3 in Finland).


4. Updating safety standards and
implementing the highest standards: Binding and effective safety standards at the
highest level must be implemented across the EU for those reactors that will still
operate in the medium term. The nuclear safety directive that was adopted in 2009 is
merely an empty shell and should be completely revised. Full liability of
nuclear operators in case of incidents or accidents must be guaranteed.


5. No further EU public money should be
spent on nuclear. Currently almost 5 times as much EU funds are set to be
allocated to nuclear research as compared to research for renewables and efficiency
(1).

 

Several recent energy scenarios show that
ambitious energy efficiency and renewables strategies, combined with a
modernisation of the energy infrastructure, make a phase out of nuclear as well as coal
possible by 2025-2030 (2). We agree with Commissioner Oettinger that the energy
strategies of the EU urgently have to be revisited. We therefore urge the Commissioner
to push for an EU wide nuclear phase out and to start the energy revolution in
Europe.

 

For this he urgently has to:

-propose
binding energy saving targets

-set
out the goal of a 100% renewable energy based economy by 2050 in the forthcoming EU energy roadmap.

 

(1) Euratom Framework Programme including the
extra €1.3 billion for ITER (as proposed by the European Commission in the
Framework Programme Euratom for nuclear research and training activities
2012-13 on 7 March 2011) could reach €5.51 billion for the period 2007-13, while only 50%
of the Energy FP7 are devoted to renewables and energy efficiency, amounting to
1.225 billion

 

(2) Set out in a number of energy scenarios
including the ‘Vision Scenario’ by the ÖkoInstitut, commissioned by the Greens/EFA
group: http://www.greens-efa.org/cms/topics/dokbin/368/368667.the_vision_scenario_for_the_european_uni@en.pdf 

Foto: central nuclear de Cofrents. Font: AFP



Deixa un comentari

L'adreça electrònica no es publicarà. Els camps necessaris estan marcats amb *

Aquest lloc està protegit per reCAPTCHA i s’apliquen la política de privadesa i les condicions del servei de Google.