La trappola

Us deixo una bona iniciativa del recent constituït Col·lectiu Emma.

El prestigiós diari Financial Times va publicar el passat 15 d’abril l’article Spain’s ‘coffee for all’ can be a bitter brew, on presenta una visió esbiaxada de Catalunya. Seguint la iniciativa que es va iniciar amb la resposta a l’article How much is enough de la revista The Economist, s’ha constituït el Col·lectiu Emma,
que té com a objectiu respondre (ja sigui nosaltres directament o fent
difusió de respostes que compartim fetes per altres persones) a les
informacions inexactes que apareguin a la premsa internacional sobre la
realitat nacional catalana.

**********
To the Financial Times

Dear Sir,

Once
again, the Madrid correspondent of a major British publication -The
Economist started on that path a few months ago- has done a good job of
echoing the prevailing opinion in the Spanish capital about the
country’s regional make-up. Presenting also the other side of that
argument would have been welcome and certainly fairer. We shall presume
to give him one or two brief pointers.

On the culture front, the
centralist view that he uncritically endorses treats the existence of
languages other than Castilian as an artificially imposed burden and a
bothersome factor for the good conduct of the State and the economy.
Strangely, no correspondent has ever been heard making a similar point
about other societies with minority languages. If Catalans (roughly 10
million speakers) are expected to renounce their measly native tongue
to embrace their larger neighbour’s exalted speech, perhaps little
Denmark (5,5 million), or even the Netherlands, ought to give up their
own vernaculars in favour of high German, which would certainly open
many doors in one of Europe’s heavyweights right across their borders.
And what about puny Israel (around 7 million)? Wouldn’t it be a good
idea for Israelis to forget that nonsense about Hebrew and start
teaching their children Arabic, spoken by almost 300 million of their
up-and-coming neighbours? Those are all examples of other advanced
societies that have chosen to keep their own mother tongue -and their
identity with it- and also, quite reasonably, made sure that everyone
is given the chance to have a good command of English. Indeed, few
Catalans would object if they were given the choice to study English as
a second language instead of having Spanish imposed upon them.

As
to the economy, and particularly the last sentence in the article
regarding who foots the bill not only for the system of autonomous
communities but for the far from lean central government as well, your
correspondent would have found an indisputable answer if he had taken
the trouble to direct his glance at the egregious fiscal imbalances
among the Spanish regions. For instance to the fact that in 2005
Catalan taxpayers forked out to the State 19,000 million euros more
than they got back in services or investments. That should have given
him a clue as to who pays the Spanish bill, and also as to why a
sizeable and growing segment of the educated public in Catalonia
question the need for a viable society to keep subsidizing a political
entity with a less than successful historical record, and then being
told what to do -about language, among other things- by the less than
capable representatives of that very entity. Perhaps a field trip to
Barcelona, and a chat with the right people there, would serve to
enlighten your correspondent on all that and more.

Us ha agradat aquest article? Compartiu-lo!