raulromeva |
dimecres, 10 de març de 2010 | 16:59h
Efectivament, primer s'ha votat una proposta de resolució que ha presentat el PPE, que ha estat derrotada. Després s'ha votat un text conjunt signat per ALDE, Socialistes, GUE i Verds/ALE, la qual sí ha estat adoptada 355 vots a favor i 287 contra. Adjunto l'explicació de vot que he fet al final de la votació per explicar la mava posició favorable:
'Explanation of vote by Raul Romeva i Rueda: I voted positively to the motion for a
Resolution RC7-0136/2010 on the Goldstone Recommendations mainly because it
insists in asking for a strong EU position on the follow-up to the Goldstone
report is requested by publicly demanding the implementation of its
recommendations and accountability for all violations of the international law,
asks all parties to conduct investigations that meet with international
standards within 5 months, and demands an active monitoring of the
implementation of the report by the HR/VP and EU MS is requested. Further more,
it add new points to what the EP has already said in the past such as to ask
the HR/VP to assess the results of the investigations by all parties and report
back to Parliament, recalls that the responsibility and credibility of the EU
and its MS requires full monitoring of the investigations and shows concern
about pressure made on NGOs involved in the elaboration of the Goldstone report
and in the follow-up investigations, including reference to the restructive
measures towards their activities.'
'Explanation of vote by Raul Romeva i Rueda: I voted positively to the motion for a
Resolution RC7-0136/2010 on the Goldstone Recommendations mainly because it
insists in asking for a strong EU position on the follow-up to the Goldstone
report is requested by publicly demanding the implementation of its
recommendations and accountability for all violations of the international law,
asks all parties to conduct investigations that meet with international
standards within 5 months, and demands an active monitoring of the
implementation of the report by the HR/VP and EU MS is requested. Further more,
it add new points to what the EP has already said in the past such as to ask
the HR/VP to assess the results of the investigations by all parties and report
back to Parliament, recalls that the responsibility and credibility of the EU
and its MS requires full monitoring of the investigations and shows concern
about pressure made on NGOs involved in the elaboration of the Goldstone report
and in the follow-up investigations, including reference to the restructive
measures towards their activities.'